Obsolete Voting Machines Could Ruin The Election

Imagine you went to your basement and dusted off the laptop or mobile phone that you used in 2002. What would happen if you tried to turn it on? We don’t have to guess. Around the country this election year, people are going into storage, pulling out computers that date back to 2002 and asking us to vote on them.

Following an election meltdown of epic proportions in 2000, the federal government provided more than US$2 billion to update the nation’s voting infrastructure. More than a decade later, these voting machines are approaching the end of their expected lifespans. Experts estimate that a reasonable lifespan for electronic voting machines (which are computers, running mainly on laptop technology developed in the 1990s) is in the 10- to 15-year range.

To determine the state of voting machines across the country, we interviewed more than 100 election administrators in all 50 states. We also consulted scores of public records, spoke with independent technology experts and analyzed data collected by the Verified Voting Foundation. Based on this research, we project that in November 43 states will use voting machines that are at least a decade old.

That’s a problem for three big reasons.

Breakdowns lead to lines, and lost votes

Voting lines in Richmond, Virginia, during the 2012 election.
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters





First, while no one thinks all the voting machines are going to break down simultaneously, using aging voting equipment on Election Day increases the likelihood of breakdowns. In fact, one New Mexico election official told us that before replacing her machines in 2014, as many as one in three needed to be taken out of service.

We saw the consequences in 2012. People waited in line for hours, which prevented between 500,000 and 700,000 people from casting a ballot. Voting machine problems this November could lead to more long waits and lost votes: in March, we saw thousands of voters in Arizona wait in line for hours.

Equally troubling is that aging machines can be difficult to maintain. In more than 40 states, jurisdictions use voting machines that are no longer manufactured. As these machines get older, parts become scarcer and election officials are increasingly forced to hoard rare parts needed to keep their equipment running. Neal Kelley, registrar in Orange County, California – the sixth-largest jurisdiction in the country – told us that he relies on a “back stock” of spare parts to keep his machines running. At some point, the inability to find replacement parts will mean more voters sharing fewer working machines.

Finally, there are security risks. Many older voting systems rely on outdated operating systems, like Windows XP and 2000, which are no longer supported. Several election officials told us that they stockpile refurbished laptops that can run obsolete versions of Windows. Sherry Poland, director of elections in Hamilton County, Ohio, told us that she “stockpiled older PCs that will run Windows XP.” Other experts, like Merle King in Georgia, told us that his state hired a contractor to build custom hardware that will work with Windows 2000. Unsupported software is riskier from a security perspective, since it does not receive regular security updates and is vulnerable to new methods of attack.

An enormous price tag

A WinVote machine.
Rob Pegoraro/flickr, CC BY-SA

These anecdotes translate into real problems at polling places. The Virginia Department of Elections conducted a review after machines crashed during the 2014 election. Investigators easily hacked into several WinVote machines, which used decade-old Wi-Fi encryption standards, exposing serious security vulnerabilities. As a result of these findings, the Elections Board decertified the machine, forcing 30 jurisdictions to replace their equipment, costing taxpayers millions.

While most business offices upgrade their systems and update computers every few years, critical computing infrastructure for elections is treated differently. We do not expect our laptops or our desktops to last a decade – and this is the kind of technology that voting machines use. The easy answer is to replace the machines, but in much of the country, that is not happening.

Many election officials who believe they need new machines do not have sufficient funding. We identified jurisdictions in 31 states that will need new machines in the next few years. Election officials in 22 of those states told us they do not know how they will pay for them.

According to our estimates, the cost of new machines could exceed $1 billion. It is unlikely that the federal government will provide another infusion of billions of dollars to pay for new voting equipment. Despite hundreds of millions of dollars flowing abroad to strengthen democratic institutions in other countries, little to nothing is provided for elections at home.

Making systems more nimble for the future

State and local policymakers have not had to pay for voting machines in the past because of federal funding for updated voting equipment in the wake of the 2000 election debacle. Faced with a new demand amid many competing budget priorities, they have been slow to respond to this important need.

While some states and counties will provide funding for new machines, others will not. Disparities in funding between and within states has the potential to create a two-tiered election system, where poorer (and often rural) counties are forced to use aging voting equipment far longer than they should, while wealthier jurisdictions can afford to replace their hardware.

In late 2014, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe proposed that the state invest $28 million in new voting equipment. Ultimately, Virginia legislators stripped the funding for voting equipment from the budget and the cost for new machines was left to localities. Virginia’s commissioner of elections, Edgardo Cortes, told us that that only some Virginia election jurisdictions can afford new machines: “Loudon and Fairfax counties – two of the largest and wealthiest counties in the state – have bought new equipment. Smaller, poorer and more rural counties around the state are going to have a tough time.”

Despite the challenges posed by the widespread aging out of voting machines, there is hope for the future.

Just in prototype: A next-generation voting machine.
Lucy Nicholson/Reuters

Our report highlights advances in technology that could make voting systems more affordable and flexible over time. In places like Los Angeles and Travis County, Texas (where Austin is located), election officials are looking at using open source software and commercial off-the-shelf hardware to make systems that are more agile – making it possible to replace parts here and there, instead of replacing an entire voting system at the first signs of degradation.

While such advances will help us in future years, they will not resolve today’s crisis. There is no escaping the immediate need to plan and set aside sufficient funds to buy new machines.

The ConversationLawrence Norden, New York University and Christopher Famighetti, New York University

Lawrence Norden, Deputy Director, Democracy Program, Brennan Center for Justice, New York University and Christopher Famighetti, Voting Rights Researcher, Democracy Project, Brennan Center for Justice, New York University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.


Related: Hillary Clinton’s House of Cards
Posted in ,
imginn instagram

What is Imginn? Is it a good tool for downloading Instagram photos?

By Staff Writer | October 29, 2022

Imginn allows you to save your Instagram stories online for free! This new service allows you to download Instagram stories and highlights, photos, videos, and…

mircari platform

Review: Mircari Social Media Platform Helps Brands Increase Visibility

By Andrea Kay | October 29, 2022

What is Mircari? Mircari, a social media management platform, helps businesses increase their online presence. It automates the creation and maintenance of social media…

Ramneek Sidhu Digital Kings

How Ramneek Sidhu Built A Social Media Marketing Empire with his Digital Kings Business

By Andrea Kay | October 26, 2022

Trending on socials in the recent past is one of the successful young entrepreneurs and digital marketing specialists—Ramneek Sidhu. People on the internet trend…

Adore by Priyanka

Review: Adore by Priyanka Jewelry Collection

By Andrea Kay | October 26, 2022

Adore by Priyanka is an online jewelry store that focuses on handmade jewelry. The company was founded in 2014 by Priyanka Krishnan, and it…

Norstrat Consulting Incorporated

Norstrat Consulting is a Key Partner in Implementing the Canadian Northern Strategy

By Andrea Kay | October 26, 2022

Norstrat Consulting has been providing professional consulting services to the Government of Canada and military services in the northern hemisphere for over 20 years. They…

Elon Musk Twitter sink

Elon Musk Reconsiders $44 Billion Acquisition of Twitter

By Andrea Kay | October 26, 2022

Elon Musk will visit Twitter’s San Francisco Office this week, ahead of the expected closing of his deal with to buy the company. This was disclosed by…

American Red Cross Corporate Donors

American Red Cross Disaster Relief Made Possible by Corporations of All Sizes

By Andrea Kay | October 26, 2022

The American Red Cross is one of the most recognizable charities in the United States. They are an essential resource in Disaster Relief, Blood…

What Helps Build a Strong Business Reputation?

By Andrea Kay | October 20, 2022

Your reputation will make or break your business when the time comes for you to face challenges with your company. But it is hard…

Nu Image Medical Mens Health

Telemedicine is Changing the Healthcare Industry; Early Adopters like Nu Image Medical are Reaping the Benefits

By Andrea Kay | October 19, 2022

Perhaps one of the most exciting and beneficial technological advancements in the medical community has been the adoption of telemedicine. While there have been…